Keep and Bear Arms
Home Members Login/Join About Us News/Editorials Archives Take Action Your Voice Web Services Free Email
You are 1 of 761 active visitors Thursday, November 28, 2024
EMAIL NEWS
Main Email List:
Subscribe
Unsubscribe

State Email Lists:
Click Here
SUPPORT KABA
Join/Renew Online
Join/Renew by Mail
Make a Donation
Magazine Subscriptions
KABA Memorial Fund
Advertise Here
Use KABA Free Email

JOIN/Renew NOW!
 
SUPPORT OUR SUPPORTERS

 

YOUR VOTE COUNTS

Keep and Bear Arms - Vote In Our Polls
Do you oppose Biden's anti-gun executive orders?
Yes
No
Undecided

Current results
Earlier poll results
4781 people voted

 

SPONSORED LINKS

 
» U.S. Gun Laws
» AmeriPAC
» NoInternetTax
» Gun Show On The Net
» 2nd Amendment Show
» SEMPER FIrearms
» Colt Collectors Assoc.
» Personal Defense Solutions

 

 


Keep and Bear Arms

Search:

Archived Information

Top | Last 30 Days | Search | Add to Archives | Newsletter | Featured Item


Handgun Under the Tree

From: "Ross, Ken" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:18:00 -0500
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Handgun Under the Tree

Ms. Thoman,

In regards to your groups newswire posting: http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/12-11-2001/0001631649&EDATE

I pose to you one question, "Are you interested in a gun-free society?"

When you can take the firearms away from the criminals, they will pick up knives next. You take away the knives, they'll pick up clubs and so on... All the while, you are passing "sensible gun control" laws which will only affect the lawful citizen. Thereby disarming the general public and creating a "target rich" area for crime.

If you are so interested in keeping everyone safe from guns, do you have a "gun free home" sign on your front lawn?

Now, on to your argument.

Teddy bears are regulated at the product level because you give them to children. Children chew things, hence the choking test. Last time I checked, responsible parents don't hand firearms over to children whose first response will be to put the thing in their mouth.

Trigger locks? Why don't the police and other law agencies want internal locking devices on their firearms? Because they fail. In the split second moment you need to use your firearm, Murphy's Law predicts it will fail. Why are they no good for the people you choose to protect you and yet they ARE good for the people that choose to protect themselves and their families? Oh and by the way, the police have no obligation to protect you (http://www.hoboes.com/pub/Firearms/Government/Courts/Police%20Responsibilities)

Chamber load indicators? Something else that will by nature fail and then give opportunists such as yourself to sue because of genuine product failure. The first rule of firearms; A firearm is ALWAYS loaded until you have physically inspected it in the appropriately safe manner for the type of firearm in question.

Where do you get your stats from? 32,436 deaths in '97? What age range? I can show you that in '97 there were only 10,729 firearm related homicides. http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/cius_00/00crime2_3.pdf

Here's a good one: How many safety regulations do we have on doctors? The National Academy of Sciences estimates 98,000 deaths per year due to malpractice, prescription errors and other medical mistakes. http://www.direct-action.org/Articles/doctors.html Someone else thinks the good doctors should be regulated: http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b430b4e1300.htm

How about we put locks on medical bags and syringe load indicators? Okay, I'm being sarcastic...

If you don't want a firearm in the house, don't get one. Oh, and not that you would know anything about getting one. In most states, in order to get one you have to go through training and registration to tiresome degrees just to get a permit. You would be breaking the law to just hand one over to someone as a gift.

Regards,
Ken Ross

Programmer/Analyst
Molon Labe


To Get Your Letters Printed Here
Click here and read submission guidelines.

Printer Version

 QUOTES TO REMEMBER
All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void. � Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (2 Cranch) 137 (1803)

COPYRIGHT POLICY: The posting of copyrighted articles and other content, in whole or in part, is not allowed here. We have made an effort to educate our users about this policy and we are extremely serious about this. Users who are caught violating this rule will be warned and/or banned.
If you are the owner of content that you believe has been posted on this site without your permission, please contact our webmaster by following this link. Please include with your message: (1) the particulars of the infringement, including a description of the content, (2) a link to that content here and (3) information concerning where the content in question was originally posted/published. We will address your complaint as quickly as possible. Thank you.

 
NOTICE:  The information contained in this site is not to be considered as legal advice. In no way are Keep And Bear Arms .com or any of its agents responsible for the actions of our members or site visitors. Also, because this web site is a Free Speech Zone, opinions, ideas, beliefs, suggestions, practices and concepts throughout this site may or may not represent those of Keep And Bear Arms .com. All rights reserved. Articles that are original to this site may be redistributed provided they are left intact and a link to http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com is given. Click here for Contact Information for representatives of KeepAndBearArms.com.

Thawte.com is the leading provider of Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) and digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites, and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks.

KeepAndBearArms.com, Inc. © 1999-2024, All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy