Give These Women Guns
Give These Women Guns
by
Vin Suprynowicz
Oct. 20, 1999
The newspapers reported Donna Hernandez of Las Vegas did everything she
could to protect herself. Fearing that her estranged husband was going to
kill her, she repeatedly informed the police that she feared for her life.
She even went to court and got protection orders.
Seven of them.
It didn't help. Two weeks ago, Donna Hernandez was found stabbed and
strangled in her home. Her ex-husband is now in jail, facing murder
charges.
About a third of all slayings in the Las Vegas Metro police jurisdiction
stem from domestic violence. In October of 1997, 17-year-old Maureen
McConaha obtained a protective order against her ex-boyfriend. Weeks later,
she was shot to death. The ex-boyfriend, Johnny Walker, is awaiting trial
on murder charges.
In January of 1998, police found Judy and Ronnie Norman dead inside the
couple's Las Vegas home. Next to their bodies police found a protective
order that Judy Norman had taken out against her husband. Police ruled the
deaths a murder-suicide.
In October of last year, Brenda Denise James was shot to death in front
of her six children, days after she applied for and received a protective
order against her ex-boyfriend, Robert Lee Carter, 30. A murder charge
against Carter is pending.
While court-issued protective orders are "a good tool for law
enforcement, they don't stop a bullet or knife, and we need to make sure
everyone knows that," offers Clark County Domestic Violence Commissioner
Patricia Doninger.
"We have to find a better way to protect people like Donna Hernandez,"
says a frustrated District Judge Nancy Saitta.
But that better way has long been available. God may have made women, but
Colonel Colt made women equal, and carrying the tool he invented remains
the constitutional right of every American.
The problem is, so far as can be determined, Donna Hernandez, Maureen
McConaha, and Brenda Denise James did not do
everything they could to protect themselves and their children: They did
not buy and carry handguns, and acquire the skill to use them.
Police cannot provide an armed bodyguard for every woman who's been
threatened. Therefore, police should actively recommend that such women
acquire appropriate, effective weapons for self-defense, and the minimal
training necessary to handle them safely.
In fact, if any arbitrary "background check" or "concealed-carry permit"
paperwork delays stand in the way of a woman who holds such a valid
"protection order" and wishes to acquire a handgun, our state lawmakers--
and particularly U.S. Rep. Shelley Berkley, a proponent of women's rights
and an avowed supporter of the Second Amendment-- should immediately
introduce legislation to provide for an instant waiver of any such waiting
periods or bureaucratic delays, authorizing the immediate, legal placement
of a handgun in any such woman's purse.
Those with an irrational phobia of firearms-- though they would never
propose that we send our boys to Bosnia armed with nothing more than a
whistle on a key ring-- will whine that "A woman is in greater danger if
she has a gun; the assailant will just take it away and use it on her."
In fact, Gary Kleck, professor of criminology at Florida State University
in Tallahassee, examined the statistical evidence for that concern in his
book, "Targeting
Guns."
Guns are taken away from their owner and used by an assailant in fewer
than 1 percent of defensive handgun uses, Professor Kleck determined. Nor
is there any indication that more widespread gun ownership would turn our
neighborhoods into "shooting galleries": Dr. Kleck also found that in more
than 90 percent of defensive handgun uses, the weapon isn't even fired.
"It's one of the great lies of the anti-gun people, that people are so
incompetent that they're going to have their guns taken away from them,"
says David Kopel, research director of the Independence Institute in
Golden, Colo. and author of the
book "Guns:
Who Should Have Them?"
In fact, if the authorities would send out a notice that the victim is
now armed, along with the court "keep-away" order, most of these attacks
might never occur, at all.
"There's very strong evidence that knowledge that victims have guns is a
great deterrent to attacking," adds Don Kates, a criminologist with the
Pacific Research Institute in California. "The National Institute of
Justice has sponsored extensive surveys of criminals in prisons, and ...
they attest that they were far less likely to commit crimes against people
when they knew that they were likely to be armed.
"The other thing is, it is universally reported that women respond much
better to firearms training than men do, because the problem with men is
that their testosterone levels get in the way," Mr. Kates explains.
"They're supposed to already know about guns, and so you have to get them
to unlearn things that they know that are wrong, and they're very stubborn
about that."
So, if at-risk women find it easy to learn to use guns safely and
effectively, why aren't they all urged by authorities to go out and get
themselves a Smith & Wesson?
"That's to admit that the whole system is a complete failure," explains
criminologist Kates. "Notice that the whole thing with restraining orders
is a failure designed to remedy a failure. We already have laws against
violence, so why do we need restraining orders? Because police won't
enforce laws against violence within the family."
October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month, a time when our political
leaders annually call on us to reflect on the number of domestic-violence
incidents that occur each year, and to take action to stop them.
OK then. Let's stop mooning and moaning. Let's do something that works.
It's not big, sturdy men who fear to be the last person leaving the
shopping mall late at night, walking across that darkened parking lot. It's
America's women.
Let's really reduce violence against our womenfolk. Let's give them guns.
Vin Suprynowicz is one of the
most articulate spokesmen serving on the front lines of the Freedom Movement we
have. Vin's timely and well written articles are syndicated in newspapers all
around the country, and they circulate around the world freely on the Internet
and in Libertarian publications. He is the author of Send
in the Waco Killers, the book that tells the details the media failed to
tell in plain English. The best way to get Vin is to subscribe directly to the
e-mail distribution list for his column. Send a request to [email protected]
with "subscribe" in the subject line.
It is an honor to host this man's work, and we
encourage you to visit his site and read his book. To read other articles by Vin
on this site, click here.
You can also see his full archives at these two sites:
http://www.nguworld.com/vindex
http://www.infomagic.com/liberty/vinyard.htm
|