|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
A Purse Is No Place for a Gun
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In New York last month the glitterati descended on Manhattan for its annual Fashion Week. A week later in Fayetteville, North Carolina, some highly specialized designs were showcased on a much smaller runway.
A women�s shooting group called the Gun Powder Gals hosted a fashion show at a local VFW post that featured bra holsters, corset holsters, and thigh holsters. Such fashion shows have recently popped up in other states, seemingly in response to a reported spike in women buying guns for self-defense and sport.
|
Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/13/2015)
|
Someone could drop a purse and the gun would "go off"?
Please.
Relying on that asinine "Mike The Gun Guy" isn't conducive to a rational thought process. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|