|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
WI: Buying a firearm shouldn't be easier than voting
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
To vote in Wisconsin, you have to register with the government, provide proof of where you live, and show election workers an official identification card.
To buy a gun in Wisconsin � even a military-style weapon � you can quickly and discreetly get one from an unlicensed dealer with little or no scrutiny. You don�t even have to pass a background check when you purchase a gun from a private seller online or at a gun show. |
Comment by:
jac
(5/13/2021)
|
A solution in search of a problem.
Criminals don't buy their guns at gun shows.
They steal them, buy them on the black market (mostly stolen by someone else), or buy them through straw purchases.
Denying individuals the right to freely sell their private property will only affect law abiding citizens and will not have any affect on crime or violence.
Criminals will get guns regardless of any laws designed to prevent that. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. � Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|