|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/18/2019)
|
Idiots.
A mass shooter on a mission will carry as many magazines as he can, with minimum interruption on reloads.
On bread, in cooking, no difference. |
| Comment by:
RichardJCoon
(10/18/2019)
|
| I really don't see a ban working..... I can't envision a line of potential mass shooters waiting patiently to turn in the "large capacity" (or standard if your educated) magazines. All grumbling about having to change magazines now.... |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/18/2019)
|
The Virginia Tech shooter, Cho, used two handguns, one a .22, and killed about 3 dozen people.
The Mary Stoneman Douglas High School shooter, on 2.14.18, used a AR-15 with a bag full of TEN ROUND MAGAZINES to murder with.
Do libtards find the # of victims in THESE events acceptable?
No?
Neither do I.
But magazine bans will not work....
and the fact remains, THEY WANT OUR GUNS! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
