|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
The Supreme Court Down the Stretch
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
So we can thank Justice Clarence Thomas for pulling back the curtain a bit this week when he issued a public dissent from the court�s refusal to hear a challenge to a San Francisco gun control ordinance. This case, Jackson v. City and County of San Francisco, went to conference six times before the court issued an order on Monday denying review. Even without Justice Thomas�s dissenting opinion, which only Justice Antonin Scalia joined, it would have been obvious that something was afoot, but we wouldn�t have known exactly what. |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(6/11/2015)
|
"Seven years ago, in District of Columbia v. Heller, the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that the Second Amendment gives individuals the right to own a gun."
It did no such thing. It confirmed that the Second Amendment GUARANTEES an individual right to keep and bear arms.
But, a liberal is a liberal is a liberal. According to liberals, we only have the rights GIVEN by government, its edicts, or its rulings.
Can you say IGNORANCE? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Wherever standing armies are kept up, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms is, under any colour or pretext whatsoever, prohibited, liberty, if not already annihilated, is on the brink of destruction. � St. George Tucker, in his edition of 'Blackstone's Commentaries,' 1:300 (1803). |
|
|
