|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NASA Astronaut Mark Kelly and His Tired Rhetoric
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
NASA astronaut Mark Kelly was almost a widower. Kelly's wife, former Arizona Rep. Gabby Giffords, was shot point blank in the head eight years ago, as she met with constituents outside a Safeway grocery store during a "Congress on your corner" meet-up. Miraculously, Giffords survived, but six other people who were at the event died that day, including a nine-year-old. |
Comment by:
PHORTO
(8/7/2019)
|
"All political power comes from the barrel of a gun. The communist party must command all the guns, that way, no guns can ever be used to command the party." � Mao Tse Tung. |
Comment by:
gariders
(8/7/2019)
|
Hitler and his party said that if you tell a story enough the people will believe it. |
Comment by:
gariders
(8/7/2019)
|
do you think that Mr. Kelly would stand up to Hollywood and insist that all violence be removed from television until after 10 p.m. The mass of America population has been indoctrinated with non stop shooting, and other crimes by the media. And don't forget the evening news. only violence can and should be portrayed after 10 or 11 p. I don't think so...��.. We need to try something different. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|