|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
mickey
(12/15/2016)
|
Well, if this is the case, then Kyle needs to ALWAYS have a gun just to sit on his own porch:
But Kyle said he�s had two people confront him, threatening him because he had a firearm.
�He said if I didn�t have that gun I�d cut you up real good,� Kyle said remembering something a man outside his house said to him this week. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(12/15/2016)
|
| Maybe he was musing the thought of preventing an active shoter senario, because the FED won't do it! |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/15/2016)
|
| Helicopter parents's concerns aren't an exception to exercising the 2nd Amendment right on one's own property. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| To prohibit a citizen from wearing or carrying a war arm . . . is an unwarranted restriction upon the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men with army pistols or guns, the evil must be prevented by the penitentiary and gallows, and not by a general deprivation of constitutional privilege. [Wilson v. State, 33 Ark. 557, at 560, 34 Am. Rep. 52, at 54 (1878)] |
|
|
