|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Marlin Model 94 CSBL
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I�ve been using rifle-caliber Marlin lever guns � .30-30, .35 Remington, .45-70 � most of my life and I confess to being a little late to the pistol-caliber party. Truth be told, my interest in the M94 was sparked by John Taffin�s enthusiasm. I figured if John liked it, there had to be something to it. The Marlin Model 1894 was originally built to accept the most popular late 19th Century handgun cartridges � .44-40, .32-20 .38-40 and the like. By the 1970s the menu had grown to include our two powerful, preeminent pistol-caliber offerings � the .44 and .357 Magnum |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(11/5/2019)
|
| Too pricey. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? � Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
