|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
dasing
(12/7/2016)
|
| More BS study by tyrants! |
| Comment by:
punch
(12/7/2016)
|
| Oregon has mandatory background checks but that didn't prevent Columbine or Umpqua College. I'm calling BS on this story. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(12/7/2016)
|
"States that required background checks for gun buyers .... "
It's a FEDERAL requirement, idiot. FEDERAL. THAT means EVERY state must use a NICS check.
Thus how can you conclude ANYTHING about the number of school shootings in relation to firearms checks.
|
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(12/7/2016)
|
| San Bernardino Christmas party, Taft High School, and others. B.S. Cali, your state has provided bogus stats and will only get worst in the near future. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/7/2016)
|
Begin with a lie, and the rest of your screed becomes suspect.
All states have background checks pursuant to federal law.
None of those states have background checks for purchasing ammunition, and of states that do, the "odds" claim is pure speculation. To prove that claim, you must show that without them, those states would be more susceptable, which is impossible to prove.
Get off it. Everybody, and I mean EVERYBODY knows that you guys blow liberal smoke, and liberal thinking defies natural law. |
|
|
