|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Rules for Them, and Different Rules for You If You Have a Gun
Submitted by:
Robert Morse
Website: http://slowfacts.wordpress.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Some anti-rights activists are sure the rules don�t apply to them. They have armed bodyguards while they want to make sure you�re disarmed. Simply stated, the rich gun-grabbers have one set of rules for them, and a different set of rules that apply to you. Listen to what they say and see what they do."
"Jonathan Romans is an active member of both anti-self-defense groups Moms Demand Action and the [CSGV]. He often comments on their pages. Mister Romans called for harassment and violence against law abiding gun owners. He said,"
"'..when a stranger enters a public place armed, ask to see his permit. If he produces one, cross your fingers. If not, then tackle him, or shoot him, because then it will not be too late.'" ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(2/2/2015)
|
| Well there's always been "different law" for the elites as NYC's "Sullivan Act", exemplified a century or so back. Why suppose the "beautiful people" would surrender that "position of superiority"? Or its symbols - armed bodyguards ? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)] |
|
|
