|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Anti-Gun Extremist Invents Call For Armed Insurrection
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In responding to NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre�s CPAC speech, gun control advocate Ladd Everitt falsely claims that the NRA has long called for armed insurrection, but can provide no real proof of that claim.
Everitt argues that NRA spent the run-up to the election urging group members to be ready to grab their guns and defend freedom to the point of �insurrection� if Donald Trump lost. But his argument is more than suspect, and the supporting data is even weaker. |
| Comment by:
dasing
(3/3/2017)
|
| The NRA promotes defence of firearm owners, NOT murder! |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/3/2017)
|
| The link she'sa no worky. |
| Comment by:
-none-
(3/3/2017)
|
kalipornia separatist gun collections:
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/6d/90/ce/6d90cebaed4b6803501c20344263bd87.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/1a/90/ac/1a90ac9548dc5f2e59b3236d821a723e.jpg
https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/39/41/2e/39412e6dfeb2d506035f2d91d58eb8e5.jpg
http://media.bizj.us/view/img/1239001/scottferber4nerfjb*750.jpg
-
pull down state on list: https://act.nraila.org/default.aspx |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
