Hi Friends,
I bravely watched the ABC special with talking head Peter Jennings last
night. The first 45 minutes was actually pretty good.
There was a very short glance at Charleton Heston, then they started talking
about how the NRA has made such a big turnaround in the last year and a half.
Wayne LaPierre was interviewed a lot. We got to see him speaking to large
meetings and in small meetings discussing which commercials to run before the
election.
I was surprised that ABC showed a lot of individual NRA members at ranges, at
the convention, and in town hall meetings with politicians. They used to portray
the NRA as an evil, faceless organization that derived its influence from
mysterious industry donations. They are apparently finally realizing that the
NRA is people. Our efforts are slowly paying off.
The president of Smith and Wesson seemed very sad that the NRA is mad at him
now. Another guy who used to run the gun manufacturers lobby, before he decided
to deal with Clinton, got a lot of time to say what he thought of the NRA.
Although the NRA is apparently responsible for the demise of his lobby, he does
not seem too bitter and actually had some interesting things to say about gun
politics.
The nasty point of the program was about what happens to people who
"cross" the NRA. ABC probably thought that their effete liberal
viewers would really be horrified at how the NRA can play hardball. The last 15
minutes was about Congressman Bart Stupak from Michigan. He was a 100% NRA
supporter from a strong gun owning district who decided to vote against the NRA
on a big gun show related bill. The NRA is now opposing him for re-election. We
got to see him walking around a lot with a real sad look on his face. He goes to
town hall meetings in his district and all his constituents want to know is why
he betrayed them on the gun vote. You almost feel sorry for the guy.
At the end, Peter Jennings has to show what a tough interviewer he is by
interrogating LaPierre in person. As we know, LaPierre is not that good under
stress, so it was easy for Jennings to make him look bad. Jennings accused the
NRA of lying about the gun show bill in letters to Rep. Stupak. He criticized
the NRA line that only a few felons been prosecuted for attempting to purchase a
gun. Jennings said the real number was about 600 per year and he waved some
papers in front of the camera. Of course there was no time to really examine
this question. As with all TV news programs, it was really pretty superficial.
If you ignore the part about how the NRA turns on those who cross them, it
was really a lot of free advertising for the NRA. They built up the NRA to seem
like some kind of super lobby that never loses a vote and can defeat any
politician anywhere anytime. They neglected to mention that the NRA has very
little influence in areas where people don't own many guns.
In retrospect, even the part about what happens to traitors was pretty good.
The NRA needs to have a stick as well as a carrot to keep those pathetic
politicians in line.
I suppose that some liberal urban voters might take an anti-NRA message from
this program, but it just made me want to send in an extra donation this month.
Take Care,
Mike Brown
Dr. Michael S. Brown is an optometrist and member of Doctors
for Sensible Gun Laws. He may be reached at: [email protected].
You can read other articles of his at http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com/Brown.
KABA NOTE: Good writeup, Mike. We concur. The one
area where LaPierre really missed a chance at Jennings' chin was when he was
being belittled with some "facts" about there having been 600
prosecutions. We wish it had gone like this:
"Mr. Jennings, I would love to look through your information
and find out that there have actually been 600 felons jailed after having
broken the law by trying to purchase weapons even though they are prohibited
from doing so, and I would be elated to find out we missed the number by
a fraction of a percentage point. But, since we don't have time here to
validate your claims - which I still doubt - for the sake of this
conversation, let's assume you are correct. If that were true,
my question would then be this: why have there only been 600 people
prosecuted out of hundreds of thousands who broke the law? I'm sure
you'll get back to me on this, because you are so thorough in your
journalistic integrity."
It was also obvious that some creative editing was taking place. Having
taped the interview and gone back through a couple of key points, I noticed that
when Jennings asked LaPierre if the NRA really doesn't want to solve the
problem, the cut showing LaPierre's answer was chopped. (Part of the answer was
missing.)
Peter Jennings showed his true colors, again. If he'd have been a poker
dealer in the Wild West, he'd have been plugged a long time ago - for
cheating.
Angel Shamaya
Director, KeepAndBearArms.com